Me, You, & You Too; or You, You Too, & Me?

Me, You, & You Too; or You, You Too, & Me?

Yup, the Issue of Academic Authorship (Roles) Emerges Again

Through our webinars and individual consults with postgraduate research students, many have asked the time-old question regarding shared authorship – especially for conference papers and articles published during and post-graduation. We usually point them in the direction of Kearns et al 1996 as a good discussion document.

For some in academia though, it’s quite a touchy subject; with many students ‘feeling’ that it isn’t important. Well, that’s a matter of opinion, as well as an extension of historical practice in some parts of the world.

Our take on the matter is that it is important! The ‘application of rules’ may not be consistent across geographies, but the importance of acknowledging the various contributions and roles played in creating a final published piece of research is both a matter of academic integrity and respect.

This very recent post by Dr Helen Kara is not only timely, but it discusses the difference between ethical co-writing and ethical co-publishing – an important added dimension to the discussion. In many cases, research students look reactively and don’t give adequate consideration to the issues; as many supervisors simply look for ways to rack up named-publication credits.

We urge research students to be proactive in discussing authorship with supervisors and other stakeholders in their research journey. We highly recommend Dr Kara's article as a great starting point for you to think through the issues:

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/03/29/a-simple-guide-to-ethical-co-authorship/

Additional references worth exploring include:

Kearns, R., Arnold, G., Laituri, M., and LeHeron, R., 1996, "Exploring the Politics of Geographical Authorship", Area, Vol 28, No 3, September, pages 414-420.

Myers, K.R., George, D.R., and Green, M.J., 2017: Whose Name Goes First? (chronicle.com)

Tay. A., 2016: Five tips to overcome authorship conflict : Naturejobs Blog

and the following from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: ICMJE | Recommendations | Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors

Each of these give strong points to consider, and will help research students to be more informed about their rights and obligations when publishing.

Comments

Defending THE Institution?

Defending THE Institution? Maybe I am trying to defend a fallen castle, but I don’t quite believe it’s at that stage yet! While applauding businesses, big and small, embracing alternative qualifications to facilitate employment opportunities, one must remember that the University itself is not only a centre of learning – it is an entire socialisation and networking experience that has significant value-add over and above the content of learning and assessment. Encouraging short or modular online learning is perfectly fine, but we must not kid ourselves that it provides a holistic approach – either to topic or to social inclusion. Nor does it pave the way to successful remote working. There’s far more to those jig-saw puzzles than just a course. There will always be value in a full university degree. Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater just yet. __________ Google Plan To Replace The Need For College Degrees With Six-month Certificates The tech giant G

Dear New PhD Student

Dear New PhD Student Dear New PhD Student This is an exciting time for you as you embark on your journey towards a doctoral degree. As your supervisor, I thought I should write to welcome you and give you a few handy hints that may help both of us to survive this long journey. We both have much to learn. Although we have exchanged emails, we do not know each other well. I feel at the outset, we have to display the good in us, and hide the crazy. Over the next three years this balance will switch, as we each reveal our true selves. My role is to guide you through the minefield that is the modern research process. You will learn how to identify gaps in knowledge, critically review literature, pose useful research questions, devise testable hypotheses, acquire the necessary ethical approvals, collect and analyse data and so on. But remember I am not your sister, nor your mother, nor am I your counsellor – I am not your friend either. Some supervisors regularly socialise with their s

Upcoming Webinars | June & July 2021

Upcoming Webinars | June & July 2021 For the remainder of June, plus the four (4) weeks in July, we have a series of webinars that focus on approaches to research, literature, and research communication. The webinar topics are applicable to early and mid-journey PhD candidates, but anyone thinking of, or nearing completion of their journey are welcome to attend. Wednesday 23 June 2021 | Introduction to Observational Research Facilitator | Dr Craig J Selby Observational research allows the researcher to see what their subjects really do when confronted with various choices or situations. As the name implies, is a way of collecting data through observing – either directly or indirectly – but either way, the researcher has an active involvement in the process. Observation data collection method is classified as a participatory study, as the researcher immerses themselves in the setting where the respondents are. Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/introdu

The Third Degree

Search This Blog