Me, You, & You Too; or You, You Too, & Me?

Me, You, & You Too; or You, You Too, & Me?

Yup, the Issue of Academic Authorship (Roles) Emerges Again

Through our webinars and individual consults with postgraduate research students, many have asked the time-old question regarding shared authorship – especially for conference papers and articles published during and post-graduation. We usually point them in the direction of Kearns et al 1996 as a good discussion document.

For some in academia though, it’s quite a touchy subject; with many students ‘feeling’ that it isn’t important. Well, that’s a matter of opinion, as well as an extension of historical practice in some parts of the world.

Our take on the matter is that it is important! The ‘application of rules’ may not be consistent across geographies, but the importance of acknowledging the various contributions and roles played in creating a final published piece of research is both a matter of academic integrity and respect.

This very recent post by Dr Helen Kara is not only timely, but it discusses the difference between ethical co-writing and ethical co-publishing – an important added dimension to the discussion. In many cases, research students look reactively and don’t give adequate consideration to the issues; as many supervisors simply look for ways to rack up named-publication credits.

We urge research students to be proactive in discussing authorship with supervisors and other stakeholders in their research journey. We highly recommend Dr Kara's article as a great starting point for you to think through the issues:

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/03/29/a-simple-guide-to-ethical-co-authorship/

Additional references worth exploring include:

Kearns, R., Arnold, G., Laituri, M., and LeHeron, R., 1996, "Exploring the Politics of Geographical Authorship", Area, Vol 28, No 3, September, pages 414-420.

Myers, K.R., George, D.R., and Green, M.J., 2017: Whose Name Goes First? (chronicle.com)

Tay. A., 2016: Five tips to overcome authorship conflict : Naturejobs Blog

and the following from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: ICMJE | Recommendations | Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors

Each of these give strong points to consider, and will help research students to be more informed about their rights and obligations when publishing.

Comments

Statement of Commitment on Climate Change (The Third Degree)

Statement of Commitment on Climate Change The Third Degree acknowledges the scientific consensus regarding the existence of climate change and the substantial contribution the human population is now making to this via our greenhouse gas emissions. Climate change is one of the biggest global health threats of the twenty-first century. Current international carbon reduction commitments are nowhere near enough to avoid this threat. Despite the urgent need for steep reductions in greenhouse gas emissions to avoid dangerous climate change, the level of global emissions continues to increase. The threat to future generations grows larger with every passing year. The current generation of adults has a responsibility to do everything we possibly can to protect the children of today and tomorrow from dangerous climate change. Hence it is of utmost importance that climate change is included as an urgent priority area for advocacy, research, policy and practice...

Upcoming Webinars | June & July 2021

Upcoming Webinars | June & July 2021 For the remainder of June, plus the four (4) weeks in July, we have a series of webinars that focus on approaches to research, literature, and research communication. The webinar topics are applicable to early and mid-journey PhD candidates, but anyone thinking of, or nearing completion of their journey are welcome to attend. Wednesday 23 June 2021 | Introduction to Observational Research Facilitator | Dr Craig J Selby Observational research allows the researcher to see what their subjects really do when confronted with various choices or situations. As the name implies, is a way of collecting data through observing – either directly or indirectly – but either way, the researcher has an active involvement in the process. Observation data collection method is classified as a participatory study, as the researcher immerses themselves in the setting where the respondents are. Register Here: https://www.eventbrite...

Negativity & the PhD I think we all know that the PhD is not a walk in the park; no one expects it to be. There are challenges, some quite big too, as part of the journey. Our growth and development is both professional and personal. Professional in developing our skills and credibility as a research. Developing research skills, intuition, communication skills, and of course, learning along the way. Personally, we grow in our confidence, in our interpersonal and collaborative skills, and in our negotiation, compromise, and maybe even crisis management skills. To me, these are all positives. Growth is positive, even if there’s a little pain in the way. What concerns me personally though is the excessive, almost overwhelming negativity out there about the journey, especially on social media. So called ‘support groups’ over-emphasise negatives on the journey – poor supervisors, funding issues, R2, the toxicity of academia – many as...

The Third Degree

Search This Blog